0 results for 'Cowan Liebowitz Latman'
Decision and Orders & Decree and Orders signed between:April 1-12, 2024
'Philpot v. Independent Journal Review'
In 'Philpot v. Independent Journal Review', the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court's findings regarding fair use and copyright registration validity.ERISA Complaint Dismissed as Untimely; Plaintiff Not Entitled to Equitable Tolling
Appeals & Motions List released on: February 13, 2024
Phone Home: Inflatable Alien Costume Held Copyrightable
To ring out the old year on an otherworldly note, the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a preliminary injunction in a case involving the unauthorized copying of an inflatable adult Halloween costume that created the "whimsical" illusion that the wearer was being carried around by a seven-foot-tall green space alien.View more book results for the query "Cowan Liebowitz Latman"
'Kerson v. Vermont Law School'
In 1993, Kerson and the Vermont Law School entered into an agreement for Kerson to paint two murals on the walls of the upper level of the Chase Community Center. During the summer of 2020, the law school's president received a petition demanding the removal of the murals. Kerson sued the law school, seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining it from placing panels over the murals, invoking his rights under VARA.Big Law Firms Call on Top Law Schools to Condemn Anti-Israel Protests, Harassment
A group of more than 200 leading law firms implored law schools to reign in "anti-Semitic activities" on campus as Israel's response to the Oct. 7 attacks draws protest worldwide.Color and Shape of Watermelon-Flavored Candy Were Functional by Helping Candy Resemble Watermelon Wedge
Sweet Defeat: 3rd Circuit Says Candymaker Can't Trademark Watermelon's Shape and Colors
"Because the tricolored shape is recognizable as watermelon-flavored, the whole appearance is useful," Third Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote. "So a candymaker cannot block competitors from using the combined shape and colors by trademarking that combination. We will thus affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment."'Thaler v. Perlmutter': AI Output is Not Copyrightable
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently upheld a final refusal by the U.S. Copyright Office to register a visual work that was not the product of human authorship but was instead created by a computer algorithm. The sole legal issue of the case, Thaler v. Perlmutter, was whether a work autonomously generated by an AI system is copyrightable.