Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Booking.com B.V.'

You can use to get even better search results
Ryanair DAC v. Booking Holdings Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-12-25
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Aerospace | E-Commerce | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Bryson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-1191-WCB

Court denied motion for leave to amend counterclaims due to defendant's lack of diligence in seeking leave upon immediately learning of the facts supporting the amendment, which occurred before the close of discovery.

Olinsky & Assocs. PLLC v. Nutting
Publication Date: 2021-07-14
Practice Area: Trademarks
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, U.S. - NDNY
Judge: District Judge Mae D'Agostino
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendants: John Joseph Pelligra, Esq., Michael A. Oropallo, Esq., Kayla A. Arias, Esq., of counsel, Barclay Damon, LLP, Barclay Damon Tower, Syracuse, New York.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants: Rui Oliveira Santos, Esq., of counsel, Law Office of Rui O. Santos, Esq., Tinton Falls, New Jersey. Attorneys for Defendants: Robert E. Purcell, Esq., of counsel, Office of Robert E. Purcell, Syracuse, New York.
Case number: 5:20-CV-01142

Counterclaims Dismissed; Lanham Act's Breach Not Stated, Standing to Bring Claim Lacking

WickFire v. Woodruff
Publication Date: 2021-03-29
Practice Area: Business Torts | Civil Appeals | Internet Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Owen
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 17-50340

Plaintiff WickFire and TriMax are competitors in the pay-for-performance search engine marketing business, a form of internet marketing.

March 16, 2021 | Law.com

Compliance Hot Spots: Jenner's New Financial Litigation Plan | MoFo Snags DOJ Antitrust Lawyer | Who Got the Work: Latest Lobbying Disclosures | All the New Moves

Welcome to Compliance Hot Spots, our weekly snapshot on white-collar, regulatory and compliance news and trends.
6 minute read
Future Proof v. Molson Coors
Publication Date: 2020-12-14
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Intellectual Property | Trademarks
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Smith
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-50323

Future Proof Brands, LLC and Molson Coors sell competing hard seltzer beverages.

August 20, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

On Social and Commercial Issues, the Roberts Court Produces Balanced Results

A popular focus of the general and legal press, both this past spring and in recent years, has been the leftward list of the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts.
8 minute read
August 20, 2020 | New York Law Journal

Recent Trademark Decisions by the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has recently been active in accepting trademark cases for review. This article discusses the four cases which the court has recently decided.
14 minute read
July 21, 2020 | New York Law Journal

US Supreme Court Ruling Opens Door for Registration of 'Generic.com' Marks

In 2011 and 2012, Booking.com, a digital travel company that allows consumers to make hotel and other reservations online, filed applications to register trademarks with various visual features, all for travel-related services, and all including the term "Booking.com," writes Rob Maier in his Patent and Trademark Law column.
8 minute read
July 01, 2020 | Daily Report Online

The Big Winners in SCOTUS' Booking.com Decision Have Big Trademark Prosecution Budgets

A clear win for Booking.com and brand owners also creates more uncertainties than it resolves.
6 minute read
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V.
Publication Date: 2020-06-30
Practice Area: Trademarks
Industry: Travel and Tourism
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
Judge: Judge Ginsburg
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-46

Combination of generic term with ".com" suffix yields generic composite not entitled to trademark protection only if so perceived by consumers

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now