Hi Technology Corp. v. Quality Investment Properties Suwanee, LLC
Publication Date: December 07, 2023Industries:ContractsPractice Area:Call CentersCourt: Georgia Court of AppealsJudge: Judge WatkinsAttorneys:For plaintiff: Keith Blackwell, James Grant, Jonathan Parente, Caroline Rawls, Anderson Kemp, (Alston & Bird LLP), Atlanta, for appellant.For defendant: David Balser, Robert Griest, Billie Pritchard, Charles Spalding, (King & Spalding LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.Case number: A23A0808
Matter of Newsday LLC v. Nassau County Police Dept.
Publication Date: December 05, 2023Industries:Information Governance and CompliancePractice Area:State and Local GovernmentCourt: Appellate Division, Second DepartmentJudge: Justice Presiding Valerie Brathwaite NelsonAttorneys:For plaintiff: For Appellant: David A. Schulz and Alia L. Smith of counsel, Ballard Spahr LLP, New York, NY.For defendant: For Respondent: Robert F. Van der Waag and Samantha A. Goetz of counsel, Thomas A. Adams, County Attorney, Mineola, NY.Case number: 2021-08455
Businesses should spend the time to make sure they are compliant with California's Automatic Renewal Law and the road to cancellation for users is clearly paved, according to Alston & Bird's David Carpenter, Gillian H. Clow, and Brooke H. Bolender.
6 minute read
Appellate Division, Second Department: November 28, 2023
Publication Date: November 28, 2023Industries:Civil AppealsCriminal AppealsPractice Area:Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down ListJudge: Unsigned Attorneys:For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Hansford v. Veal et al.
Publication Date: November 22, 2023Industries:Business TortsCivil ProcedureContractual DisputesPractice Area:Court: Georgia Court of AppealsJudge: Judge HodgesAttorneys:For plaintiff: Philip Eichelzer, (The Law Offices of P. Kent Eichelzer, III), Woodstock, for appellant.For defendant: John Nichols, John Kennedy, (James Bates Brannan Groover, LLP), Macon, for appellee.Case number: A23A0836
"IFI takes issue with the fact that Howard pleads that either IFI or Nashville Quality, LLC were responsible for the accident or sabotage that resulted in glass in her food. IFI argues that '[b]ecause the allegations concede it is just as probable that the damages were caused by someone other than IFI and further fails to identify what IFI did or failed to do to cause the damages, the Complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief.' ... This is wrong," District Judge Thomas T. Cullen for the Western District of Virginia wrote. "IFI conflates Howard's burden of proof with the pleading requirements.
4 minute read
A look at Frederick II who, behind his numerous titles and positions, including both king and emperor, was an "inexhaustible intellectual adventurer and a bold politician and strategist."
8 minute read