0 results for 'Ball'
Tit for Tat: Attorneys Want Opposing Counsel Penalized
Quinn Emanuel litigator Alex Spiro, representing Elon Musk, argued opposing counsel Mark Bankston of Farrar & Ball violated the discovery order numerous times by posting questions outside the scope of the court order.Phila. Associate Talent Market Cools, as Local Firms Refine Retention Strategies
"They could be happier financially or happier culturally, but there are less disgruntled attorneys at their current firms looking to get out," said Alevistar Legal Search founder Brian Levinson.'Delay and Pray': Short- and Long-Term Loan Accommodations and Workout Arrangements
"Operating under such regulatory edicts, lenders remain under pressure to triage underperforming and/or unrefinanceable loans without employing harsh enforcement mechanisms," according to Rosh Jaffe of CSG Law.7 Pieces of Advice for Mid-Level Associates
Advice that might apply to most junior and mid-level associates.Quinn Emanuel's Alex Spiro Facing Sanctions Hearing Over Appearance for Elon Musk in Texas Case
Spiro allegedly appeared on Musk's behalf in defamation case filed in an Austin, Texas court without having filed for pro hac vice status. According to the plaintiff's filing for sanctions, Spiro was combative and "berated opposing counsel" when appearing unannounced for a deposition.View more book results for the query "Ball"
Quinn Emanuel Partner Faces Sanctions Hearing in Elon Musk Defamation Suit
"As damaging as it was, Musk's deposition could have gone even worse but for the obstructionist conduct of the attorney," plaintiffs attorney Mark Bankston claimed.'Ignore This Bill at Your Peril': Federal Privacy Legislation Has Teeth—and Real Shot at Passing
"That's what's most important to think about: What will this change about business models?" said Alysa Hutnik, a senior executive at the privacy software firm Ketch.'Ignore This Bill at Your Peril': Federal Privacy Legislation Has Teeth—and Real Shot at Passing
"That's what's most important to think about: What will this change about business models?" said Alysa Hutnik, a senior executive at the privacy software firm Ketch.$14.4 Million Award: Silver Golub & Teitell Secures Victory
"We're pleased that the jury rejected the attacks on Mr. and Mrs. Griswold during the trial and recognized the defendants' responsibility for causing Mr. Griswold's terrible injuries," Silver Golub & Teitell partner Joaquin Madry said. "This is yet another example of a jury sorting through a lot of misdirection and finding a just result."The Masquerade Ball: When Plaintiffs Mask Claims to Get Around a Lack of a Private Cause of Action
Whether a particular law provides for a private cause of action can have huge consequences for potential corporate defendants. Such a right opens the floodgates to plaintiffs, often represented on a contingency fee basis, asserting claims that may be meritless. The crushing wave of privacy class actions in recent years—made possible by the private causes of action in the underlying state privacy laws—shows what can happen.Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now