Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Bailey & Glasser LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
Hartree Partners LP v. Vaquero Permian Processing LLC
Publication Date: 2024-04-10
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Energy | Mining and Resources
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Justice Manuel Mendez
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Respondent: Robert A. Mantel and Melvin A. Brosterman of counsel, Crowell & Moring LLP, New York.
For defendant: For Appellant: Elliott McGraw of counsel, Bailey & Glasser LLP, Port Chester, Joshua I. Hammack of the bar of the District of Columbia, and State of Maryland, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, and Bailey & Glasser LLP, Washington, DC.
Case number: 651999/20

June 2023 $9M Award for Breach of 2021 Agreement to Buy Back Natural Gas Is Affirmed

Appellate Division, First Department: April 4, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-04
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:April 2, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department: March 15, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:March 13, 2024

March 06, 2024 | The Recorder

California Roundup Case Dismissed Midtrial, Monsanto Declares Victory

Plaintiffs lawyers on Tuesday voluntarily dismissed a Roundup case in California's Sonoma County Superior Court on the third day of trial.
2 minute read
February 14, 2024 | Law.com

Roundup Trials in Four States? Monsanto Could Face Four Trials This Month

Roundup trials are scheduled to start in the coming week in California, Pennsylvania and Arkansas. A fourth trial began earlier this month in Delaware.
4 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department: January 8, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-01-08
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:January 4, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department: November 7, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-11-07
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Motion List & Order on Application released on:November 3, 2023

Ramco Asset Management, LLC v. USA Rare Earth, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David A. Felice, Bailey & Glasser, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew St. Laurent, Harris St. Laurent & Wechsler LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: John M. Seaman, E. Wade Houston, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Chelsea Corey, King & Spalding LLP, Charlotte, NC; Carl D. Neff, FisherBroyles, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Aurora Cassirer, Christina H. Bost Seaton, FisherBroyles, LLP, New York, NY; Karen E. Keller, Andrew E. Russell, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Justin L. Ormand, Allen & Overy, New York, NY; Patrick W. Pearsall, Allen & Overy, Washington, D.C. for defendants.
Case number: 2022-0665-SG

Plaintiffs were former equity holders in an Australian rare-earth mining company, whose primary asset was interest in a mining project in West Texas. Defendants transferred the company's assets to a new Delaware entity. Plaintiffs' fourteen causes of action alleged that defendants promised that plaintiffs would each receive an equivalent amount of equity in the Delaware entity as each had previously held in the mining company, however, they alleged that the transactions had diminished their ownership interests. Defendants' motions to

October 17, 2023 | Law.com

College Athletics Programs Face Likely 'Collision' Between NIL Deals and Title IX

"...[T]here is a coming collision because the people who are implementing NIL are talking about how this is the wild, wild west, and that they can do anything thing that they want. And no they can't. If they violate Title IX, there is a law there," said Arthur H. Bryant, a partner at Bailey Glasser in California.
6 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now