Search Results

0 results for ''Morrison & Foerster LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
April 01, 2024 | Law.com

Future of Litigation: Keeping Pace with the Rapid Rate of Change

Join this annual Future of Litigation webcast and hear from industry experts how technology, the economy, and changes to the law are transforming litigation strategies and be empowered  to thrive going forward.
4 minute read
EPAC Tech. Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-03-05
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Justice Jeffrey K. Oing
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellant-Respondent: Kevin H. Kim of counsel, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Albany.
For defendant: For Respondent-Appellant: Lena H. Hughes, J. Alexander Lawrence, Adam J. Hunt and Alexandra Avvocato of counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York.
Case number: 653979/18

Company's Sale of Assets Is a Repudiation of Parties' Master Service Agreement

Appellate Division, First Department: February 26, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-02-26
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:February 22, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department: February 23, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:February 21, 2024

November 02, 2023 | The American Lawyer

Big Law Firms Call on Top Law Schools to Condemn Anti-Israel Protests, Harassment

A group of more than 200 leading law firms implored law schools to reign in "anti-Semitic activities" on campus as Israel's response to the Oct. 7 attacks draws protest worldwide.
8 minute read
VMware, Inc. v. Wood
Publication Date: 2023-05-30
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Elena C. Norman, Elisabeth S. Bradley, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Arturo J. González, Shaelyn K. Dawson, Camille Framroze, Meredith L. Angueira, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Kasey H. DeSantis, Nathan D. Barillo, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neil A. Capobianco, Fox Rothschild LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: 2022-0820-PAF

Former employee lacked right to enforce repurchase option where his stock options and unvested stock were cancelled in connection with his employer's acquisition in exchange for the right to payments from the acquiring company that would terminate if the employee left the acquirer's employ.

Hatfield v. Walmart Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-04-27
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Products Liability
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Denise L. Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Ashley C. Keller, Keller Postman LLC, Chicago, IL. Mikal C. Watts, Watts Guerra LLC, Millennium Park Plaza RFO, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. The Lanier Law Firm, W. Mark Lanier, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant Walmart Inc.: Kristen Renee Fournier, King & Spalding LLP, New York, NY. Donald F. Zimmer, Jr., Ethan P. Davis, King & Spalding LLP, San Francisco, CA. Livia M. Kiser, King & Spalding LLP, Chicago, IL. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC. For 22md3043 Defendant Sam's West, Inc.: Kristen Renee Fournier, King & Spalding LLP, New York, NY. Donald F. Zimmer, Jr., King & Spalding LLP, San Francisco, CA. Austin Evans, King & Spalding LLP, Austin, TX. For 22md3043 Defendant The Kroger Co.: Gregory E. Stone, Joseph A. Lara, Stone | Dean LLP, Woodland Hills, CA. For 22md3043 Defendant Rite Aid Corporation: David M. Katz, Karen G. Felter, Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For 22md3043 Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corp., and Walgreen Co.: Kristen L. Richer, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Los Angeles, CA. Sandra M. Ko, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Washington, DC. Nadine S. Kohane, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, New York, NY. For 22md3043 Defendants 7-Eleven, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., and Family Dollar Stores, LLC: Lori B. Leskin, Mitchel Russell Stern, New York, NY. For 22md3043 Defendant Target Corporation: Julie Y. Park, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Diego, CA. For 22md3043 Defendants Safeway Inc. and Dolgencorp, LLC: Amanda L. Groves, Gregory A. Ellis, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
Case number: 22 MC 3043

Tennessee's TCPA Not Exempt From Preemption Provision of Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Takadu LTD., v. Innovyze, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-04-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Ronald P. Golden III, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert P. Feinland, Jason J. Poulos, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Anne S. Gaza, Samantha G. Wilson, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Jacobs, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kyle Mooney, Kyle D. Friedland, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: 21-291-RGA

The court ordered the parties to submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on several disputed claim construction terms at issue in a patent litigation matter.

In the Matter of Sylvia G. Ash, admitted as Sylvia Gwendolyn Ash, an attorney and counselor-at-law. (Attorney Registration No. 2000099)
Publication Date: 2022-11-17
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts
Judge: Per Curiam Before: Hector D. Lasalle, P.J., Mark C. Dillon, Colleen D. Duffy, Betsy Barros, Francesca E. Connolly, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Diana Maxfield Kearse, Brooklyn, NY (David W. Chandler of counsel), for petitioner.
For defendant: Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY (Nathan D. Reilly of counsel), for respondent.
Case number: Motion No. 2022-00638

Matter of Ash

Appellate Division,First Department: October 6, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-10-06
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:October 4, 2022

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now

    • Countdown to Compliance: SEC Private Fund Reforms

      Brought to you by Ontra

      Download Now