The 2012 Paulsboro derailment / Credit: U.S.C.G. Lt. Cmdr. Timothy Holt
The Third Circuit on Wednesday found no abuse of discretion in rejection of the plaintiff's medical expert for failure to proffer a sufficiently reliable causation methodology under the standard set out in the U.S. Supreme Court's 1993 "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals" decision.
August 15, 2018 at 04:18 PM
1 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed a $500 damages award to a plaintiff who claimed he was exposed to toxic chemicals after the 2012 derailment of a freight train in Paulsboro.
Plaintiff Ronald Morris, in In Re: Paulsboro Derailment Cases, asserted on appeal that his medical monitoring and fear-of-cancer claims failed because a judge wrongly excluded his expert testimony.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
