A New Jersey appeals court has upheld a $2 million malpractice verdict against an insurance broker for underestimating the replacement cost of a bowling alley. The appeals court rejected a challenge to the verdict by Brouwer Hansen and Izdebski Insurance Associates of Toms River. BHI's claims on appeal were without merit, the panel said in Loyle Lanes Bowling Center v. Greater New York Mutual.
September 05, 2017 at 07:44 PM
1 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court has upheld a $2 million malpractice verdict against an insurance broker for underestimating the replacement cost of a bowling alley.
The appeals court rejected a challenge to the verdict by Brouwer Hansen and Izdebski Insurance Associates of Toms River. BHI’s claims on appeal were without merit, the panel said in Loyle Lanes Bowling Center v. Greater New York Mutual.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
