Filter This View

  • Wiggins v. Hackensack Meridian Health

    Publication Date: 2024-04-18
    Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3847-22

    Defendants appealed the denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiffs' medical malpractice complaint.

  • State v. Baker

    Publication Date: 2024-03-18
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender (Tiffany J. Barlow, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief)
    for defendant: Jennifer Webb-McRae, Cumberland County Prosecutor (Stephen Christopher Sayer, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief)
    Case Number: A-2800-21

    Detection of Odor of Marijuana During Traffic Stop for Moving Violations and Detention on Outstanding Warrants Was Spontaneous and Provided Probable Cause for Warrantless Search

  • State v. Baker

    Publication Date: 2024-03-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2800-21

    Defendant appealed the denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in a search of his vehicle during a traffic stop.

  • Pritchett v. State

    Publication Date: 2024-02-12
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter G. Verniero (Sills Cummis & Gross, PC, attorneys; Peter G. Verniero and Michael S. Carucci, of counsel and on the briefs)
    for defendant: Deborah Lynn Mains (Costello & Mains, LLC, attorneys; Deborah Lynn Mains and Miriam S. Edelstein, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-1414-21

    Employer's Forcing Worker Suffering from MS to Retire Rather Than Engaging in Interactive Process Supported Punitive Damages Award

  • Pritchett v. State

    Publication Date: 2024-01-30
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1414-21

    The state appealed the trial court's judgment on remand.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition

    Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Merck & Co., Inc v. Ace Am. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2023-05-22
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Insurance | Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James E. Rocap, III (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice (Walsh Pizzi O'Reilly Falanga LLP, and James E. Rocap, III, attorneys; James L. Brochin, Liza M. Walsh, James E. Rocap, III, Marc D. Haefner, and Selina M. Ellis, on the joint briefs); Philip C. Silverberg (Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP, attorneys; Philip C. Silverberg, Bruce Kaliner (Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, Hilary M. Henkind (Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass LLP) of the New York and Massachusetts bars, admitted pro hac vice, Maegan McAdam, William D. Wilson, and Craig R. Rygiel, on the joint briefs).
    for defendant: Mark W. Mosier (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice (Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski PC and Mark W. Mosier, attorneys; Anna P. Engh (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, Mark D. Herman (Covington & Burling LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, Mark W. Mosier and Russell L. Hewit, on the brief).
    Case Number: A-1879-21 & A-1882-21

    Hostile/Warlike Action Insurance Exclusion Did Not Apply to Cyberattack Purportedly Facilitated by a Government

  • Merck & Co., Inc. v. Ace Am. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2023-05-01
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1882-21

    Defendants appealed the grant of summary judgment to plaintiff in its declaratory judgment action for insurance coverage for damages to computers from a cyberattack.

  • Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Comm'n v. George Harms Constr. Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-04-17
    Practice Area: Government
    Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis V. Cook (Fox Rothschild LLP, attorneys; Francis V. Cook, of counsel and on the briefs; Corinne B. DeBerry and Ian C. Gillen, on the briefs)
    for defendant: Brian P. O'Neill (Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC, attorneys; Brian P. O'Neill, John F. Casey and Chelsea P. Jasnoff, on the briefs)
    Case Number: A-1484-20

    Bi-State Entity Lacked Authority to Enforce Project Labor Agreement Requirement Where Its States Had Differing Laws Governing PLAs

  • Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Comm'n v. George Harms Constr. Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-04-04
    Practice Area: Government
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-1484-20

    Defendant appealed the trial court's order that dismissed their counterclaims and also dismissed plaintiff's declaratory judgment complaint as moot.

  • Strickland v. Foulke Mgmt. Corp.

    Publication Date: 2023-03-13
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection
    Industry: Automotive | Retail
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Currier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Ricci
    for defendant: Capehart & Scatchard, PA, attorneys for respondent (Laura D. Ruccolo, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-0455-21

    Court Dismissed Action to Vacate Arbitration Award Where Parties' Arbitration Agreement's Judicial Review Scope Preempted by Governing Federal Law