The Supreme Court has thrown out a challenge to a portion of Gov. Chris Christie’s 2011 pension reform act that suspended state pension cost of living adjustments.

The court said a statute granting qualified state government employees a “non-forefeitable right” to receive pension benefits does not preclude lawmakers from reducing future cost-of-living adjustments. In a June 9 decision, the court ruled by a 6-1 margin that the 1997 non-forfeitable right statute did not limit future exercises of legislative power because it did not clearly state the intent to do so. The ruling reverses an Appellate Division decision holding that the 1997 statute, known as Chapter 113, declared COLAs a contractual right.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]