We agree with the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision to deny certification to a lawyer who tried to shield his new law practice from a back rent judgment against his prior firm.
February 26, 2016 at 05:40 PM
1 minute read
We agree with the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision to deny certification to a lawyer who tried to shield his new law practice from a back rent judgment against his prior firm.
In Louro v. Pedroso, the landlords brought an action for outstanding rent against Filipe Pedroso and his law firm—a professional corporation (PC) in which he was the sole shareholder. Thereafter, Pedroso established a new limited liability company (LLC) in which he was the sole member.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
