Standard & Poor’s has failed to fend off a consumer fraud suit by the state of New Jersey that accuses it of misleading consumers about the independence and objectivity of its ratings services and using outdated analytical models to maximize its market share and profits.

The complaint alleges Standard & Poor’s Financial Services harmed New Jersey consumers by claiming to be an independent source of analysis on structured finance securities when its ratings of those securities were actually driven by the company’s own revenue goals, as well as favoritism toward the investment banking clients who issued the securities and paid S&P for rating them.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]