The First Amendment was intended to protect speech not just when doing so is easy, but also when doing so is difficult. From that perspective, we agree with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in McCullen v. Coakley.

With the laudable aim of protecting patients who seek reproductive health services, Massachusetts had made it a crime for anyone, except a select few, to stand within 35 feet of a driveway or entrance to a reproductive health-care facility.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]