A New Jersey appeals court refuses to extend a doctrine that can eliminate the need for a plaintiff in a premises-liability case to prove the defendant's knowledge of a dangerous condition.
October 23, 2013 at 10:19 PM
1 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court on Wednesday refused to extend a doctrine that provides a shortcut to proving premises liability.
In a precedential ruling, the Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of a suit by a customer who claimed she slipped on a discarded telephone calling card as she left a Quick Chek store in Wantage, hurting her knee.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
