Larry Henderson's case led the New Jersey Supreme Court to tighten strictures on admission of eyewitness identification in criminal cases, but the reforms did him no good personally.
October 18, 2013 at 08:26 PM
1 minute read
Larry Henderson’s case led the New Jersey Supreme Court to tighten strictures on admission of eyewitness identification in criminal cases, but the reforms did him no good personally.
Even under the stricter standard, the testimony identifying him as an accomplice in the shooting death of a Camden man was found admissible, and an appeals court affirmed on Thursday.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
