The trial court did not err by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury on accomplice liability as none of the evidence could support a finding that he acted as an accomplice rather than a principal.
October 17, 2013 at 02:27 PM
1 minute read
State v. Maloney, A-64 September Term 2011; Supreme Court; opinion by Rodriguez, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned; dissent by Albin, J.; decided October 16, 2013. On certification to the Appellate Division. [Sat below: Judges Fuentes and Gilroy in the Appellate Division; Judge Nieves in the Law Division.] DDS No. 14-1-1654 [34 pp.]
Defendant Osborne Maloney was charged with attempted murder and related charges stemming from the robbery of the home of Syoma (Sam) and Rita Shnayder.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
