Plaintiffs who fail to show they suffered an ascertainable loss from violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act are not entitled to attorney fees, the state Supreme Court holds.
September 13, 2013 at 03:11 AM
1 minute read
Plaintiffs who fail to show they suffered an ascertainable loss from violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act are not entitled to attorney fees, the state Supreme Court held Thursday.
The court, in Perez v. Professionally Green, expanded on an earlier holding that denied attorney fees where CFA claims did not survive summary judgment. In this case, the claims were dismissed after the plaintiffs' proofs.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
