A New Jersey appeals court ruling illustrates the type of doctor-patient arbitration agreement that can withstand judicial scrutiny for procedural unconscionability.
August 15, 2013 at 12:12 AM
1 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court ruling on Wednesday illustrates the type of doctor-patient arbitration agreement that can withstand judicial scrutiny for procedural unconscionability.
The decision in Moore v. Woman to Woman Obstetrics & Gynecology, A-0683-11, means the mother of a child born with Downs Syndrome must submit her malpractice claims to arbitration.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
