A New Jersey criminal investigator's destruction of notes taken during interrogation of a murder suspect is grounds for a new trial at which the jury will be allowed to draw an adverse inference.
July 31, 2013 at 01:45 AM
1 minute read
A New Jersey criminal investigator's destruction of notes taken during interrogation of a murder suspect is grounds for a new trial at which the jury will be allowed to draw an adverse inference.
The state Supreme Court held the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office made a "flagrant" discovery violation by allowing the investigator to scrap the notes after he wrote a formal report.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
