The New Jersey Supreme Court took too hard a line on deciding what extraordinary circumstances justify late filing of a notice under the Tort Claims Act.
April 04, 2013 at 01:32 AM
1 minute read
Legal phrases have a certain meaning for years, then one day with a new interpretation, they don’t. One such phrase, "extraordinary circumstances," was redefined on March 12 by the Supreme Court in D.D. v. UMDNJ in a 3-2 ruling.
The plaintiff was distressed because her health records were made public by Rutgers University and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. She retained an attorney and met with officials to remove her records from view.
Deal Watch: Skadden, Sidley, Slaughter and S&C Lead Big Paper Deal, While Private Funds Grow Massive
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
