The 16-month delay between the remand of the driving while intoxicated charge and the notice of trial deprived defendant of his right to a speedy trial.
April 03, 2013 at 03:41 AM
1 minute read
State v. Cahill, A-47 September Term 2011; Supreme Court; opinion by Cuff, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned; decided April 1, 2013. On certification to the Appellate Division. [Sat below: Judges Rodriguez and LeWinn in the Appellate Division; Judge Pugliese in the Law Division.] DDS No. 14-1-9439 [36 pp.]
The court considers whether defendant Michael Cahill’s right to a speedy trial was violated, thereby requiring the dismissal of the motor vehicle charge of driving while intoxicated (DWI).
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
