A state appeals court affirms dismissal of a legal malpractice suit, saying the judge properly concluded the plaintiff was an ex-client and therefore due a lesser duty of care.
December 07, 2012 at 05:18 PM
1 minute read
A state appeals court on Wednesday affirmed dismissal of a legal malpractice suit, saying the judge properly concluded the plaintiff was an ex-client and therefore due a lesser duty of care.
The Appellate Division held in Abreu v. Mackiewicz, A-2828-09, that the plaintiff did not allege sufficient facts to support his claim of an attorney-client relationship at the time in question.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
