The Superior Court's Law Division lacks subject matter jurisdiction to sort out who owns real property in the wake of a foreclosure, an appeals court rules.
November 07, 2012 at 05:07 PM
1 minute read
The Superior Court’s Law Division lacks subject matter jurisdiction to sort out who owns real property in the wake of a foreclosure, an appeals court ruled on Wednesday.
The Appellate Division, in Kanter v. Scharf, A-2977-11, affirmed dismissal of an action seeking a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff, not the person who obtained the foreclosure, owned the property.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
