Control Screening, L.L.C. v. Technological Application and Production Company, No. 11-2896; Third Circuit; opinion by Sloviter, U.S.C.J.; filed July 26, 2012. Before Judges Sloviter, Roth and Pollak, District Judge, sitting by designation. On appeal from the District of New Jersey. [Sat below: Judge Hochberg.] DDS No. 11-8-7269 [12 pp.]
This dispute involves New Jersey-based Control Screening, L.L.C., and Vietnam-based Technological Application and Production Company, HCMC-Vietnam (Tecapro). Control Screening and Tecapro disagree about the proper interpretation of an arbitration forum-selection clause in their contract. The district court granted Control Screening’s motion and petition to compel arbitration in New Jersey, and Tecapro appealed.
