State High Court Approves $27 Increase to 2023 Annual Attorney Assessment
"The Court is continuing to examine the staffing needs for attorney discipline, in particular the Office of Attorney Ethics," according to the bar notice. "If that examination identifies the need for additional staff, any proposed further increase in the annual assessment for 2024 will be published for comment in the usual course."
December 09, 2022 at 04:22 PM
3 minute read
Court Administration
The New Jersey Supreme Court approved the first budget increase in nine years to the disciplinary portion of the annual attorney assessment for 2023, according to a notice to the bar signed by Glenn A. Grant, administrative director of the courts.
The Disciplinary Oversight Committee unanimously recommended that the disciplinary portion of the annual assessment for 2023 be raised $27 for attorneys admitted to practice from three to 49 years. The DOC noted that New Jersey's annual fee, even at the increased rate, is far below the national average of $344 in annual assessments.
"The Court is continuing to examine the staffing needs for attorney discipline, in particular the Office of Attorney Ethics," according to the bar notice. "If that examination identifies the need for additional staff, any proposed further increase in the annual assessment for 2024 will be published for comment in the usual course."
The new annual assessment for 2023 will be raised to $175 from $148.
According to the budget proposed by the DOC on Sept. 21, the 2023 budget is slightly more than $15 million, representing a 4.4% increase from the budget approved for 2022. The primary expense is salaries and benefits, which comprise approximately 83% of the budget.
With an annual assessment of $175, the total projected revenue for 2023 is $14.6 million. The DOC estimated that 69,850 practicing attorneys between three to 49 years will pay the $175 fee, while 1,525 attorneys practicing two years or less will pay a $25 fee. The projected revenue will be $12.26 million.
Additionally, estimated fees of $2.3 million for in-house counsel, pro hac vice, and other revenue sources are projected, according to a letter accompanying the budget.
"With total projected revenues of $14,604,600 and total expenses of $15,018,354, there will be a budgeted deficit for 2023 of $413,754," according to the letter accompanying the proposed 2023 budget, signed by attorney Matthew P. O'Malley, chair of the DOC. "There was a budgeted deficit of $1,888,662 in 2022, but the latest estimate shows a deficit of $1,778,504. For the period from 2016 to 2021, actual reserves have averaged 29.95%. The reserve at the end of 2022 is projected to be $1,695,434, or 11.9% of the operating budget. For 2023 and 2024, reserves are projected at 8.5% and 5.3%, respectively. The Committee's goal is a 10% reserve.
"The DOC is thankful to the OAE and DRB for their diligent work in preparing and presenting the 2023 Attorney Discipline Budget," O'Malley said in the letter. "The Committee is confident that the budget is fiscally responsible and will provide the OAE and DRB with the resources needed to continue serving the public, the profession, the disciplinary system, and the Judiciary at large. As always, the Committee thanks the many volunteers that serve New Jersey's disciplinary system, making it one of the best in the country."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All2024 Continuing Legal Education Attorney Ineligible List and In-House Counsel Ineligible List
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 2The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 3Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 4Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 5Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250