Mandatory attorney review language in real estate contracts to be considered by NJ Supreme Court
The New Jersey Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this week on whether mandatory attorney review language in residential real estate contracts resulting from a real estate auction is mandated where the information is made available to potential parties in advance. The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) participated as amicus curiae in support of mandated language in Sullivan v. Max Spann Real Estate & Auction Co. F. Bradford Batcha, of Batcha and Batcha, and Martin Liberman, of the Law Office of Martin Liberman, wrote the brief. Batcha will appear on behalf of the NJSBA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]