“Appellants argue that EO 128 fails both prongs in that it is neither rationally related to protecting the public from damage related to COVID-19, nor is it closely tailored to the magnitude of the emergency,” the appellate panel said. “We disagree, finding both prongs satisfied.”
July 22, 2021 at 12:19 PM
6 minute read
An executive order by Gov. Phil Murphy that allowed struggling residential renters to pay rent using their security deposit during the pandemic was upheld by the Appellate Division on Tuesday.
The panel issued the 48-page decision in Kravitz v. Murphy on July 20 where the court rejected arguments set forth by several mom-and-pop housing providers that claimed Murphy exceeded his statutory authority and acted unconstitutionally when he issued Executive Order 128 on April 24, 2020.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Courtesy of T.Dallas/Shutterstock.com
