Pursuing product liability claims under the Consumer Fraud Act; manufacturers can be strictly liable for products made and sold by others; NJ's Appellate Division addresses the 'technical feasibility' requirement in design-defect claims; practical guidance from lithium-ion battery litigation; and federal preemption of 'structure/function' claims regarding dietary supplements.
December 14, 2020 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
**Access the Digital Edition here.**
NJ Supreme Court Opens Door for Plaintiffs to Pursue Product Liability Claims Under CFA The ‘Sun Chemical’ decision has potentially opened the door, if not the flood gates, to a new wave of Consumer Fraud Act claims in cases traditionally governed solely by the Product Liability Act. By Beth S. Rose and Charles J. Falletta
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Bigstock
