X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Matthew Adams, Jeanne LoCicero, Alexander Shalom and Lawrence Lustberg L-R: Matthew Adams, Jeanne LoCicero, Alexander Shalom and Lawrence Lustberg. Courtesy photos

In a dispute over jury selection in the age of COVID-19, New Jersey’s judiciary has been vindicated in a dispute over whether it can be represented by its own lawyer in the courtroom during a trial where its post-pandemic jury selection procedures came under challenge.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Charles Toutant

Charles Toutant is a litigation writer for the New Jersey Law Journal.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

 

New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice: A Practical GuideBook

NJ Code of Criminal Justice deciphers explains the criminal statutes to law enforcement personnel, lawyers, lay people, making the code more accessible with fact patter...

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.