Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
<i>State v. Wildemar Dangcil<i/>. Courtesy image “State v. Wildemar Dangcil.” Courtesy image

A challenge to the judiciary’s “hybrid” jury selection failed to derail New Jersey’s first jury trial since the COVID-19 pandemic after a judge found Monday that defense lawyers’ claims about a less-than-representative jury pool were meritless.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Charles Toutant

Charles Toutant is a litigation writer for the New Jersey Law Journal.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.