Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

As we have previously written, N.J.L.J. Nov. 19, 2018, the published opinion in Flanzman v. Jenny Craig, Inc., 456 N.J. Super. 613 (App. Div. 2018), introduced a new element by which arbitration clauses in New Jersey were to be judged. Despite explicit provisions in the Federal Arbitration Act and the New Jersey Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (as well as prior acts and Appendix XXIX-B to the Court Rules) providing a solution to the perceived problem, the court required that clauses must either select the forum or arbitrator to decide the dispute to be arbitrated or specify a means of designating the arbitrator.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


New Jersey Arbitration HandbookBook

First-hand guide to arbitration for practitioners and arbitrators alike, written from the perspective of what an experienced arbitrator looks for in the hearing process....

Get More Information

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.