NJ Supreme Court Orders Low-Risk County Inmates Released to Limit Coronavirus Spread
The order—the result, reached Sunday night, of mediation among prosecutors and the public defender—will suspend or commute county jail sentences for low-risk inmates.
March 23, 2020 at 12:19 PM
4 minute read
Low-risk county jail inmates will be released from prison starting early Tuesday under an order from the New Jersey Supreme Court in response to concerns over the spread of the coronavirus in those facilities.
The order—the result, reached Sunday night, of mediation among prosecutors and the public defender—will suspend or commute county jail sentences for low-risk inmates. Such sentences are currently being served either as a condition of probation for an indictable offense or because of a municipal court conviction, according to the announcement on Monday from Chief Justice Stuart Rabner.
The order would impact only those charged with third- or fourth-degree crimes or disorderly persons offenses. It does not affect state prison sentences, said Rabner.
It directs their release no later than 6 a.m. Tuesday. The affected inmates will have their sentences suspended or commuted at that time. Other inmates serving a county jail sentence will be released by no later than noon Thursday, March 26, the announcement said.
The state attorney general and county prosecutors may file an objection to any release they deem inappropriate, according to the order. In those cases, judges or special masters will hold a hearing to determine if the release would pose a significant risk to the safety of the inmate or the public.
According to Monday's announcement by Rabner, the Supreme Court on Friday relaxed the rules of the court to accept a petition from the Office of the Public Defender in response to concerns over COVID-19's spread in county jails.
The court then ordered mediation, overseen by retired Presiding Appellate Judge Philip S. Carchman, between the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of the Public Defender, the County Prosecutors Association of New Jersey, and others to reach the terms of the order.
ACLU-New Jersey, which sought the action along with the Office of the Public Defender, estimated up to 1,000 inmates will be released.
"This is truly a landmark agreement, and one that should be held up for all states dealing with the current public health crisis," said ACLU-NJ Executive Director Amol Singha in a statement. "It shows the strength of New Jersey – that when a crisis hits, we can work together to weather through with justice and humanity. We also hope that the principles guiding this agreement – compassion, dignity, looking out for all people's well-being – will play a larger role in criminal justice once this crisis abates."
Rabner said at the conclusion of the coronavirus public health emergency, those released from jail will appear before the court to determine whether their custodial sentences should be reinstated or commuted. No-contact orders, driver's license suspensions and other conditions will remain in force, the announcement said.
Matthew Adams, a partner at Fox Rothschild in Morristown and co-chairman of its white-collar criminal defense and regulatory compliance practice, lauded the court's move.
"This unprecedented move from the New Jersey Supreme Court highlights the humanitarian crisis that the COVID-19 public health emergency threatens for the often overlooked population of our state's jails and prisons," Adams said. "This emergency requires bold and decisive action. Our constitution protects individuals from cruel and unusual punishment, and requiring continued service of a county jail sentence for a relatively minor offense in the face of what appears to be the inevitable widespread extension of this crisis into our county jails would constitute just that."
"The stakeholders from the Office of the Attorney General, County Prosecutors Association, and defense bar should be commended for their expedient handling of this matter, along with the Supreme Court for relaxing the Court Rules and raising this matter on its own motion to allow for immediate direct review by the state's highest court," Adams said.
New Jersey follows similar moves in other states, including California and Pennsylvania, meant to protect jails from becoming breeding grounds for the novel coronavirus. Last week Los Angeles announced it would be releasing low-level inmates as well as consider reducing bail for thousands of nonviolent offenders.
On Friday, March 20, Pittsburgh released 200 inmates from Allegheny County Jail.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
4 minute readIn 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250