Photo: Bigstock
The New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral arguments over whether lawyers in certain fee-shifting cases must inform clients about other attorneys who may be able to represent them for less money.
October 28, 2019 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral arguments over whether lawyers in certain fee-shifting cases must inform clients about other attorneys who may be able to represent them for less money.
In Balducci v. Cige, a paralegal named Lisa Balducci retained attorney Brian Cige in 2012 to represent her in a suit on behalf of her minor son involving a claim under the Law Against Discrimination, which provides fee-shifting for prevailing plaintiffs.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
