Judge Thomas Hardiman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. (Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
Circuit Judge Thomas Hardiman said the court below "had federal question jurisdiction and should have fulfilled its 'virtually unflagging' obligation to exercise that jurisdiction."
September 19, 2019 at 11:42 AM
1 minute read
A federal appeals court has revived the dismissal of a man’s case against the state over his being ordered to pay a total of $300,000 in alimony to his ex-wife.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Wednesday held in a precedential decision that the district court below erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
