Why NJ Expungement Legislation Wasn't Signed
"Our system is not set up to do this now," Gov. Phil Murphy said of automatic expungements for marijuana and other low-level offenses, "and undertaking this task will require buy-in and commitment from all three branches of government."
August 29, 2019 at 11:19 AM
7 minute read
When Gov. Phil Murphy conditionally vetoed legislation intended to make major reforms to New Jersey's expungement law and allow individuals convicted of minor marijuana and hashish-related offenses to expunge their records, it was in part because of the burden that he said it could put on the court system and those using it.
In his conditional veto letter on Aug. 23, Murphy made several recommendations that he said would strengthen the legislation. He also urged adding amendments suggested by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
"While laudable for its social justice aims, such a process may have the unintended and unfair effect of delaying the review of standard expungement petitions," said the governor's office in an Aug. 23 release on S-3205.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Sandra Bolden Cunningham, D-Hudson, Sen. M. Teresa Ruiz, D-Essex, and Senate President Stephen Sweeney, D-Gloucester, passed the Senate by a 24-12 vote on June 10. The Assembly version of the bill, A-4498, won final legislative approval in the full Assembly, 50-15-6, on the same day.
As passed, S-3205 provides for an expedited expungement process for certain minor marijuana, hashish, and paraphernalia convictions.
The governor, with his conditional veto, said he was intent on creating "a pathway to automatic expungement" that was less time-consuming and financially draining on individuals eligible under the bill. That would require looking into the technology and cost required, among other considerations, he said.
In his 19-page conditional veto addressed to the state Senate, Murphy wrote: "Thus, only those individuals who actually apply for an expungement, meaning those who are aware of this potential remedy and have the wherewithal to navigate the legal process or afford an attorney to assist them, would be able to seek the relief afforded by the expungement process. This method is not the most efficient means for clean slate expungement, nor will it deliver relief to all eligible individuals who need it.
"To avoid this shortcoming, we should follow the lead of Pennsylvania and undertake the necessary steps to establish an automated, computerized expungement system that would allow people with multiple convictions for less serious, non-violent crimes who maintain a clean record for 10 years to clear their criminal histories without having to hire a lawyer or wade through a paperwork-intensive process," added Murphy.
"Our system is not set up to do this now, and undertaking this task will require buy-in and commitment from all three branches of government. On behalf of the executive branch, that is a commitment I am more than willing to make."
Murphy's recommendations require the creation of a system for automatic expungements for those with clean records for at least 10 years, and allow for judicial sealing of low-level marijuana offenses to ensure that individuals cannot have those convictions used against them in the future.
The governor said he prefers an expungement process that provides relief while avoiding delays.
"I applaud the sponsors' commitment to social justice, and their efforts to correct historic wrongs inflicted on our communities by a criminal justice system that has at times unfairly, and harshly[,] punished individuals," Murphy said. "Providing relief for those who have served their time, and lifting the constraints placed on them from finding meaningful work, and providing for their families following a conviction and time served is a priority that I share with legislative leaders and advocates.
"However, I believe this bill can go further for the cause of justice, and I am hopeful that we can move forward together with a bill that provides a path to automatic expungement and allows for relief for those convicted of low-level marijuana offenses."
Murphy's recommended changes in the law would:
- Require the state to implement an "automated clean slate expungement system" for individuals convicted of multiple crimes who have had a clean record for at least 10 years, to remove the need for an attorney or a paperwork-heavy administrative process;
- Establish a streamlined, electronic expungement filing system that would eliminate filing fees to petition for an expungement and the current expense of sending petition notices to various law enforcement agencies;
- Establish a task force to study the technological, fiscal, resource and practical issues and challenges involved in developing such a system, and to provide recommendations on how to create the system;
- Establish a clean slate petition process made available for the limited period between the bill's effective date and the implementation of an automated expungement system;
- Provide for a $15 million supplemental appropriation to the Department of Law and Public Safety to support its processing of clean slate expungement petitions.
- Have the court immediately seal an individual's record on the disposition of expunged charges, in part to ensure that sealed convictions won't be used for sentencing purposes in any other case.
Some expressed their support for the governor's conditional veto.
"The NAACP has been involved in the cannabis conversation solely because of its connection to civil rights," said Richard Smith, president of the NAACP New Jersey state chapter, in a statement. "We believe that the wrongs committed by the war on drugs and its agents cannot begin to be repaired until people can have their lives back from senseless low-level marijuana offenses. We are glad to see the Governor's office conditionally veto this bill in hopes of making it stronger and the language clearer."
"On behalf of the Latino Action Network we celebrate not only this legislation but also Gov. Murphy's conditional veto that adds automatic expungement for individuals who have stayed crime and conviction free for 10 years or more," said Cuqui Rivera, criminal justice reform chair at the Latino Action Network, in a statement. "The stigma surrounding a criminal record is debilitating in so many aspects of one's journey that to rebuild their lives after time served is virtually beyond possible. As advocates in criminal justice reform for the last two decades, we have worked long and hard on this very legislation."
Amol Sinha, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, said the organization would work with the governor's recommended task force and lawmakers to create a more efficient system for expungements. She said the conditional veto "puts our state on the path to ensure that New Jerseyans burdened with criminal convictions—disproportionately people of color—will no longer need to navigate an onerous legal system to obtain the well-documented benefits of expungement. Instead, they will be able to expunge their records as soon as they become eligible."
But Cunningham, prime sponsor of the expungement reform legislation that includes a provision named after her, said Murphy's proposal would limit the number of people eligible for expungement.
"For the past three years, I have worked with a broad array of civil rights advocates and law enforcement officials to improve New Jersey's expungement laws. As Americans and New Jerseyans, we believe in second chances," Cunningham said in a release.
The "Cunningham Cleanser" in S-3205 as passed permits formerly incarcerated persons to petition the court after 10 years of law-abiding life to expunge their criminal record.
"The proposed changes would significantly lessen the number of individuals who would be eligible for expungement. If expungement is a good step toward responsible citizenship, then we should be broadening the opportunity for people to expunge their records and to rejoin the workforce. There has to come a time when we understand the importance of permitting people to have a second chance."
When asked to respond to Cunningham's remarks, Alyana Alfaro, press secretary for Murphy, said on Wednesday that the governor was sticking to the statements contained in the conditional veto.
The expungement bill went through a few iterations last legislative session. While separate legislation addressing the issue was formerly introduced in November 2018, Murphy in his state budget address last March said he would support marijuana legalization only if expungement reform were made part of the package. And so expungement of minor marijuana offenses later got incorporated into the adult use marijuana bill. But that measure stalled in both houses in April, and was declared officially dead for the remainder of the 2019 legislative calendar on May 15 because of insufficient votes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
4 minute readIn 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250