Mentorship is in the 'Moments,' Cole Schotz's Usatine Says
"It's an extra conversation or it's taking a moment to check in on someone. Even the busiest of attorneys can not only spare these few moments but will undoubtedly benefit from them as well."
June 10, 2019 at 05:54 PM
4 minute read
Warren Usatine is co-chair of the litigation practice and deputy chair of the bankruptcy practice at Cole Schotz in Hackensack. According to the firm: “As part of Cole Schotz's mentorship program, Warren has accumulated more mentees than any other partner in the firm and has earned a reputation for being an actively involved mentor.” Usatine develops younger attorneys not only as practitioners but also as business generators, and “steers his attorneys toward beneficial events and organizations,” the firm said. “When attending events with Warren, his mentees know they always have a friend in the room. He takes every opportunity to introduce his team to valuable connections and ensures that his guests are getting the most from the event.” Usatine also has shown commitment to mentees' work-life balance.
Is the role of mentor one that you set out to take, or one you happened into?
It's a little bit of both—when my firm introduced our formal mentorship program, I was automatically paired with a mentee. The benefits of the program were immediate. Often while working with first-years and young associates, I can sense their hesitation to come forward with questions or ideas. However, within the parameters of the mentor program, young associates were significantly more forthcoming, and in return this created thought-provoking conversations. I knew this type of dialogue was crucial to the career development and retention of associates. Based on these experiences, I enthusiastically volunteered to take on an active role when the firm made the recent decision to expand its mentor program.
Why are mentors so important in the legal profession?
Mentors are an integral part in bridging the gap between theory and application of the law in practice. A number of our mentors at Cole Schotz have 20+ years of experience. That's over two decades of wins and losses involving clients from across industries and clients on cases with distinctly different needs. By sharing our experience, mentors can help mentees produce high-quality legal work and further assist them in developing the skills needed to merge what they've been studying in law school with the deals/cases they are now being assigned. This doesn't just benefit the associates, but the firm as a whole by creating strong teams that practice with a cohesive approach and are united through camaraderie.
Good mentors often have learned from good examples. Who are some people who have mentored you?
Spending my entire career at a firm like Cole Schotz has allowed me to benefit by learning from so many different attorneys, both inside and outside of my particular practice areas. Those relationships have guided me in developing my expertise as well as in universal areas such as dealing with clients, marketing, professional development and the business of law itself. I have been so fortunate to be surrounded by such inspiring colleagues that there are too many individuals to name.
Law is, for many, more than a full-time job. How does one create time for mentorship?
If you are invested in your firm's future and its growth, you have to invest in your associates. It has always been a goal of mine to reach a point in my career where I could dedicate real time to helping to advance the careers of younger colleagues. The younger generation will be responsible for pushing the firm forward, and so it is important to connect with them as lawyers and as people. It's an extra conversation or it's taking a moment to check in on someone. Even the busiest of attorneys can not only spare these few moments but will undoubtedly benefit from them as well.
How are the business and profession of law changing, and are New Jersey lawyers well-positioned for the future?
I think it's universally understood that increased competition for engagements and corporate counsel's increased accountability for outside legal spend have changed the business of law in many ways. I think New Jersey firms are well positioned to offer rate structures that can attract business away from larger, more expensive New York-based firms in that environment. The key is developing relationships that result in those New Jersey-based firms getting the opportunity to demonstrate their ability to handle the sophisticated engagements that historically led in-house counsel to rely strictly on so-called “big law.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250