A federal judge in Camden has rejected a hospice-care provider’s motion to recover $1.9 million in legal fees from a False Claims Act lawsuit that was dismissed for insufficient evidence.
Although the plaintiff-relators failed to provide evidence to support a conclusion that Care Alternatives submitted any false claims to the government, the lawsuit was not frivolous, vexatious or intended to harass, U.S. District Judge Jerome Simandle ruled Monday in Druding v. Care Alternatives.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]