Fotolia
A state appeals court has ruled that New Jersey law firm McManimon, Scotland & Baumann had an impermissible conflict of interest when it represented both the city of Orange and a private company working on a city-sponsored redevelopment project.
May 23, 2018 at 05:22 PM
1 minute read
A state appeals court has ruled that New Jersey law firm McManimon, Scotland & Baumann had an impermissible conflict of interest when it represented both the city of Orange and a private company working on a city-sponsored redevelopment project.
Involvement by McManimon Scotland, a 35-lawyer firm based in Roseland, on both sides of a contract violates the Rules of Professional Conduct, the Appellate Division said Wednesday in The Four Felds v. The City of Orange Township.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
