Lawyers Seek Mass Tort Status in Taxotere Cancer Drug Litigation
In response to a request to consolidate an apparently mounting group of lawsuits over the chemotherapy drug Taxotere, the New Jersey state court system has asked the bar for feedback on the possible establishment of multi-county litigation.
April 20, 2018 at 02:28 PM
3 minute read
In response to a request to consolidate an apparently mounting group of lawsuits over the chemotherapy drug Taxotere, the New Jersey state court system has asked the bar for feedback on the possible establishment of multi-county litigation.
The litigation involves, as of last month, 353 pending cases against drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis claiming products liability and fraud, and alleging that Taxotere caused permanent hair loss. A notice to the bar dated April 11 and made public the following week was issued by Acting Administrative Director of the Court Glenn A. Grant.
The application for centralization, dated March 13, was filed by lawyers from New York firm Robins Kaplan. The lawyers pointed to the number of plaintiffs spread across New Jersey as the primary reason for consolidation. Additionally, the commonality of claims contributes to the need for combining the litigation into an MCL, the lawyers claimed.
“The Taxotere (docetaxel) cases involve numerous claims with common, recurrent and complex issues of law and fact,” the application said. “All of these cases involved the chemotherapy drug known as Taxotere (docetaxel). All of the plaintiffs claim that defendants knew, or should have known that Taxotere (docetaxel) causes and contributes to permanent disfigurement and hair loss, and that the defendants failed to adequately warn of those risks.”
The application continued, “Further, all of the actions proposed for designation allege substantially similar violations of law and are based upon the same or substantially similar underlying claims surrounding the safety profile of Taxotere (docetaxel).”
The creation of an MCL would also improve coordination with the national multidistrict litigation based in Louisiana federal court, overseen by U.S. District Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt of the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Once consolidated, the cases should be sent to each plaintiff's home county for trial, the application urged.
“A contrary decision would severely prejudice a New Jersey plaintiff who does not reside in or near the county to which the centralized litigation is assigned, potentially requiring the plaintiff to live away from home, at great inconveniences and expense, due to the happenstance that there are multiple other related cases pending,” the application said. “Allowing the MCL judge to transfer the cases for trial to the plaintiffs' chosen county will protect the plaintiffs' rights, while promoting the primary goal of centralization—efficiency and consistent management and orders throughout the discovery process.”
A Sanofi spokeswoman said in a statement: “We are aware of the MCL application for the Taxotere litigation in New Jersey, and we are fully prepared to abide by whatever decision is made by the Court.”
Rayna Kessler, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in an email: “Given the number of cases filed throughout the state of New Jersey and how many women have suffered from permanent disfigurement, we believe an MCL is necessary to effectively manage this litigation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firm Seeks to Recoup Recruiter's Fee From Ex-CFO Who Had Brief Tenure on Job
3 minute readMed Mal Claim for Injury Stemming From Epidural Nets $2.75 Million Settlement
3 minute read3rd Circuit Judges Zero In on Constitutional Challenges to Medicare Drug Pricing Program
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250