Houlihan's Operator Agrees to $5M Settlement of Tip-Pooling Case With US Labor Dept.
An operator of Houlihan's restaurants in New Jersey and New York has agreed to pay $5 million in a consent judgment after the U.S. Department of Labor accused it of illegally pocketing a portion of servers' and bartenders' tips.
April 03, 2018 at 04:41 PM
5 minute read
An operator of Houlihan's restaurants in New Jersey and New York has agreed to pay $5 million in a consent judgment after the U.S. Department of Labor accused it of illegally pocketing a portion of servers' and bartenders' tips.
The Department of Labor had accused A.C.E. Restaurant Group of misappropriating employees' tips, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and paying tipped employees less than minimum wage, without fully complying with relevant regulations under the FLSA. The Labor Department also charged that A.C.E. allowed some employees to work at two or more of its locations for a total of more than 40 hours per week, without paying overtime to those employees.
The settlement calls for A.C.E. to pay $2.5 million in unpaid minimum wages and back wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages to employees. The settlement proceeds will be divided among roughly 1,400 current and former restaurant employees in varying amounts based on the level of back wages each is owed. The settlement period runs from February 2013 to May 2015. The settlement awaits the approval of U.S. District Judge Joseph Rodriguez.
“The U.S. Department of Labor will not hesitate to pursue appropriate legal measures, such as this consent judgment, so that employers commit to corrective action, restitution, and ongoing compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act,” Regional Solicitor of Labor Jeffrey Rogoff said in a statement.
Attorneys Daniel Hennefeld, James Wong, Molly Theobald, and Lindsey Rothfeder of the Labor Department's regional Office of the Solicitor in New York litigated the case for the government.
In addition to payment of the back wages and liquidated damages, the consent judgment requires the defendants to comply with the FLSA's minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and anti-retaliation provisions, and provide employees with a notice of their FLSA rights.
The New Jersey restaurants that are the subject of the Department of Labor suit are located in Bayonne, Brick, Bridgewater, Cherry Hill, Eatontown, Fairfield, Hasbrouck Heights, Holmdel, Lawrenceville, Woodbridge, New Brunswick, Paramus, Ramsey, Secaucus and Weehawken. The New York locations are in Farmingdale and Westbury.
The Labor Department suit was filed in September 2015.
The Department of Labor filed its suit in September 2015. A few months earlier, a separate suit was filed on behalf of 26 Houlihan's employees by attorney Deborah Mains, who made similar allegations. That case was filed as a collective action under the FLSA. But no more claimants were allowed to join that case after the government filed its case, said Douglas Weiner of Lipman & Plesur in Jericho, New York, who represented A.C.E. in both cases.
Rodriguez approved a settlement in the first case on March 8. The settlement in that case provided $93,500 to the plaintiffs, $33,000 in legal fees and $7,000 in costs. That case was filed as a collective action under the FLSA.
The Department of Labor suit said A.C.E. required servers and bartenders to contribute a percentage of their tips to a tip pool, and that pool was unlawfully used to pay custodians and kitchen workers. The suit also claimed A.C.E. was keeping a portion of the tip pool rather than fully distributing it.
The government said A.C.E. also required tipped employees to pool their earnings with expeditors, whose job is to assemble the various dishes and side orders, garnish for each party's order and ensur that hot and cold foods are brought to the party's table at the proper temperature, said Weiner.
The Department of Labor has previously made clear that tip pooling is permissible for front-of-the-house restaurant jobs such as host and busser, said Weiner. But whether it is permissible for the job of expediter, who operates in a middle ground between the front of the house and the kitchen, has been unclear, said Weiner. A.C.E. decided to end its practice of tip pooling for expediters in light of the Labor Department's action, he said.
Other restaurant operators won't find much guidance on tip-splitting in the A.C.E. case, said Weiner.
“Unwary employers may find themselves the subject of allegations by the Department of Labor that it has violated laws, even though they took steps to know what the requirements are and to comply with them. It's a tricky area that has gotcha traps,” he said.
A conservative approach to tip-sharing “is likely the safest way to distribute tips until this area has been fully clarified,” Weiner said. That would include any employee that spends more than 80 percent of his or her time on customer service, he said.
Mains, of Costello & Mains in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, who represented the plaintiffs in the first civil suit, did not return a call.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUnanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
4 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Commissioner Uyeda Predicts Eased Crypto Enforcement Under Next Chair
- 2How Latham & Watkins Is Using Online Training to Expand the Legal Pipeline
- 3New York DMV Overhauls Its Points System
- 4Rolled Ankle in Bank Parking Lot Nets $1.3 Million Settlement
- 5First Trial in Litigation Tying Pa. Medical Device Plant Emissions to Cancer Ends in Defense Win
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250