The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s opinion in In re MPM Silicones LLC, 874 F.3d 787 (2d Cir. 2017) (Momentive), has largely been analyzed with respect to its implications on the enforceability of make-whole provisions. Momentive, however, also had important consequences regarding the Bankruptcy Code’s “cramdown” provision, which is a significant tool for debtors seeking to effectuate a plan of reorganization in the face of non-consenting creditors.
Although Momentive provided some clarity with respect to the broad strokes of the process to be used by bankruptcy courts in the determination of cramdown interest rates in Chapter 11, the Second Circuit left unaddressed important nuances in its two-step approach. Namely, the questions of what constitutes an “efficient market,” and whether such a market exists for cramdown debt, remain unanswered, and their resolution poses significant implications for both debtors and creditors alike.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]