Maybe Chief Judge DiFiore was correct when she said at the annual New York State Bar meeting that New York is the undisputed national leader in serving the civil legal needs of low-income people. However, having the court system spend $100 million per year on such programs is wrong. Article 7, Section 8 of the State Constitution precludes giving or loaning money of the state in aid of any private corporation or association. Given this restriction, how does the Judiciary justify requesting and spending $100 million per year on Civil Legal Services to Legal Aid Societies and other organizations? In 2016 Legal Services NYC and the Legal Aid Society each received $9,786,789 from the Office of Court Administration.

Even if you do consider paying this money not a violation of Article 7 of the Constitution, Article 6 provides that the legislature shall provide for the allocation of the cost of operating and maintaining New York’s courts. It does not allow the court system to enrich organizations that provide civil legal services that are not mandated by law or judicial decision.  If any such payments are to be made, it should be a decision of the Legislature, not the court system which was established to run the trial and appellate courts.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]