Analysis

New Grounds for Foreign Banks to Resist Compliance With Third-Party Subpoenas

The scope of non-party discovery obligations to which a New York branch bank remains subject are unclear, and this uncertainty points to actions the branches can take to minimize the exposure of their parents.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Banks in New York are routinely served with subpoenas seeking information and documents for use in other parties’ disputes. Where the banks are branches of foreign entities, and the subpoenas seek confidential depositor or client information held outside the United States, the consequence can be more than just expense and distraction, but legal and reputational risk as well. Disclosure potentially would involve breaches of confidentiality agreements and even foreign blocking statutes, and may suggest claims to eager plaintiffs that the banks themselves had participated in illegal activities. The grounds on which third-party recipients of the subpoenas can fight compliance are unsettled, but a recent decision by a U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York provides significant support for aggressive efforts to resist disclosure. Still, the scope of non-party discovery obligations to which a New York branch bank remains subject are unclear, and this uncertainty points to actions the branches can take to minimize the exposure of their parents.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Trending Stories

 

Featured Product

Global Briefing

A weekly, curated selection of our international content from around the globe, across the business of law, in-house, regulatory, technology and more, with expert insights from our senior editors.

Learn More

Recommended Stories

Spotlight on DFS Trial Forum for First Cyber-Regs Case

William F. Johnson |

In the inaugural enforcement action under its new cybersecurity regulations, the New York DFS announced charges against First American Title Insurance Company in July 2020. Companies governed by the regulations and their counsel have anxiously awaited this case of first impression, and the merits of the enforcement action have been extensively covered by legal commentators. In this edition of his Corporate Crime column, William F. Johnson focuses on a less-heralded but equally important aspect of the enforcement action: how the administrative trial of the First American charges will be conducted.

Realty Law Digest

Scott E. Mollen |

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein, discusses 'Piscionere v. Gori,' 'Gutnick v. Jacobson,' and 'Alir Inc. v. Jiminez.'

More from ALM

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Privacy Policy

About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy

Publications

Law Topics

Rankings

More

Law.com

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.