Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Christine Simmons

Christine Simmons writes about the New York legal community and the business of law. Email her at csimmons@alm.com and find her on Twitter @chlsimmons

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2302" src="http://www.almcms.com/contrib

  • Cahill Gordon Reindel
  • Greenberg Traurig
  • Kasowitz Benson Torres

/uploads/sites/389/2017/09/kasowitz-benson-torres-logo-Article-201707111858.jpg" alt="" width="616" height="372" /> Kasowitz Benson Torres, the New York firm whose work for President Donald Trump has kept it in the national spotlight this year, is vowing to appeal after a Florida judge ruled that a billing fraud complaint against the firm can move forward. Patriot National, an insurance servicing company, <a href="http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202792766299/" target="_blank">sued Kasowitz in late June in Florida state court</a>, alleging the firm engaged in fraudulent billing, malpractice and other misconduct that cost the company millions of dollars of damages. For instance, Patriot said one firm biller recorded 24 hours of work for the client in a single day. <a href="http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202792766299/" target="_blank">Kasowitz moved to dismiss last month</a>, arguing New York is a more appropriate venue, as the firm had already sued Patriot for unpaid legal fees there, while Patriots "threadbare allegations" in its complaint were insufficient. But Broward County Circuit Judge Carlos Rodriguez rejected Kasowitzs arguments in late August, while asking Patriot to submit more detail from its billing statements to support its billing fraud claim. "I dont express any opinion whatsoever on the merits or the nonmerits or the ultimate resolution," the judge said, "but I think the issue is teed up for further discussion, further resolution, further litigation." <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4062182-Patriot-Kasowitz-Appeal-Notice.html" target="_blank">Kasowitz filed a notice of appeal last week.</a> Kasowitz partner Kelly Luther, who is defending the firm in the malpractice suit, said in court last month that the firm would also seek to stay the case. In a statement, a Kasowitz spokeswoman said the firm respectfully disagrees with the trial courts decision. "We are appealing that decision and are confident we will prevail on that appeal and in any event ultimately on the merits of Patriot Nationals purported claims, which are negated by documentary evidence," the statement said. Patriots lawyer in the malpractice action, William Scherer of Floridas Conrad &amp; Scherer, said in an interview that lawyers who replaced Kasowitz in multiple lawsuits to defend Patriot could be potential witnesses if the case goes to trial, but cautioned that privilege issues may complicate matters. Among others, Cahill Gordon &amp; Reindel and Greenberg Traurig took over representation of Patriot after Kasowitz left, Scherer said. <h2 class="articleSectionHeader">Clean Up the Mess</h2> Patriot, which provides back-office functions to insurance companies, had hired Kasowitz, with partner Kenneth David as the lead attorney, for representation in three Manhattan federal court suits against the Florida-based company over the sale of securities. Kasowitz also represented certain defendant directors in a shareholder action in Delaware state court. But Kasowitz pulled out of the cases in early 2017 and filed a collection lawsuit against Patriot in late May in Manhattan Supreme Court, seeking $1.097 million in legal fees. During a court argument last month in Patriots malpractice case, Scherer told the judge that Cahill partner Brad Bondi (brother to Florida attorney general Pamela Bondi) "tried to help clean up the mess that was created here" when Kasowitz left the litigation and if the client felt it was necessary to call him or other attorneys as witnesses, "we would do that." The discussion of potential witnesses arose over which forum, New York or Florida, is best to hold the case. The judge denied without prejudice Kasowitzs motion to dismiss the case based on inappropriate forum. "If this develops into a nightmare down the road because witnesses arent showing up or you cant get ahold of them, or theres some undue burden thats placed on you, please bring that to my attention," Rodriguez told the parties. In all, Patriot is bringing four claims against Kasowitz, including billing fraud, malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. Patriot argues it was breach of contract and malpractice when Kasowitz failed to ensure it could be approved counsel under the companys insurance coverage. Luther told the judge last month "theres nothing in the contract" that required the firm to become approved counsel. But the judge noted that Patriot is arguing that "competent representation would require you to do that. And I dont know the answer to that, but I think its an interesting issue." <h2 class="articleSectionHeader">Trump Work Irrelevant</h2> Patriots complaint also cited Kasowitzs separate representation of Trump in arguing it didnt receive legal services commensurate with a law firm representing the president. But the judge, on Kasowitzs request, struck the mention of Trump from the complaint. "I dont want to make a finding that representing President Donald Trump is scandalous. I will say its irrelevant," he said. This is just one of many cases keeping Patriots lawyers busy. Patriot and its executives are currently facing multiple lawsuits brought by various parties over a private investment in public equity (PIPE) deal that led to the litigation in which Kasowitz was retained. During the court arguments last month, Scherer, Patriots attorney, said the PIPE transition "caused the wheels to come off of Patriot." "This company, and all of its employees, is on the very verge of insolvency today," said Scherer, who is also defending a Patriot executive in a lawsuit brought by placement agent JPMorgan. Scherer, in an interview, said the ruling in the case against Kasowitz was "a resounding victory for us" and the parties will move on to discovery. <

  • Cahill Gordon Reindel
  • Greenberg Traurig
  • Kasowitz Benson Torres


Lean Adviser Legal

Think Lean Daily Message

"Let me put it this way. In risk assessment terms, the brutal facts are not the peril. The peril is not recognizing them. That s a segue from things are what they are to make no contentions.'"

Learn More


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.