A DELAY of almost five years between the filing of a criminal defendant`s notice of appeal and a decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, did not violate the defendant`s due process rights, a Southern District judge has ruled.
March 20, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A DELAY of almost five years between the filing of a criminal defendant’s notice of appeal and a decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, did not violate the defendant’s due process rights, a Southern District judge has ruled.
The decision will be published tomorrow.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
