X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The following electronically filed documents read on this motion by defendants for an Order precluding plaintiff from offering any evidence with respect to additional injuries and claims alleged in plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Bill of Particulars dated December 10, 2019, or in the alternative, striking and vacating plaintiff’s Note of Issue and Certificate of Readiness, and directing that plaintiff respond to defendants’ Post Examination Before Trial Discovery and Inspection dated February 26, 2020 and defendants’ Demand for Plaintiff’s Litigation Funding dated February 27, 2020, and for plaintiff to appear for a supplemental independent medical examination based upon the new and additional injuries and surgeries: Papers  Numbered Notice of Motion-Affidavits-Exhibits                EF 58-67 Affirmation in Opposition-Exhibits  EF 68-71 Affirmation in Reply-Exhibits            EF 73-76   This personal injury action arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on July 26, 2017. Plaintiff filed a Note of Issue on May 18, 2020. Defendants seek to vacate the Note of Issue and strike this action from the trial calendar on the grounds that discovery is still outstanding. Specifically, defendants seek a response to their Notice of Discovery and Inspection dated February 26, 2020, a response to their Notice of Discovery and Inspection dated February 27, 2020, and a supplemental independent medical examination of plaintiff. In opposition, plaintiff’s counsel contends that the motion should be denied as moot. Plaintiff submits a copy of his June 8, 2020 Response to the Notice of Discovery and Inspection dated February 26, 2020 and objection to the Notice for Discovery and Inspection dated February 27, 2020. Plaintiff’s counsel affirms that plaintiff appeared for a further deposition regarding the additional treatment set forth in plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Bill of Particulars on February 12, 2020. Plaintiff also does not object to appearing for a supplemental independent medical examination on a mutually convenient date. In reply, it appears that defendants have rescheduled plaintiff’s independent medical examination with Dr. Jeffrey Klein for Thursday, August 13, 2020. As such, that branch of the motion seeking an Order precluding plaintiff for offering any evidence with respect to the additional injuries and claims alleged in the Third Supplemental Bill of Particulars shall be denied. At issue, is whether plaintiff’s objection to Defendants’ Notice for Discovery and Inspection dated February 27, 2020, which seeks information regarding litigation funding, is proper. Defendants contend that the information sought is relevant to the issue of the amount recoverable by plaintiff. Defendants further contend that the non-disclosure hinders defendants’ right to properly evaluate the value of the case. Lastly, defendants argue that since plaintiff provided an untimely response, he waived his right to object to the demand. Initially, this Court finds that any delay in responding to the Notice for Discovery and Inspection is excusable due to the circumstances surrounding the global pandemic. Pursuant to CPLR 3101(a), “[t]here shall be full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action”. Upon a review of the motion papers, opposition, and reply thereto, this Court finds that the information sought regarding litigation funding is neither material nor necessary to the defense of this action. The value of a case does not depend on how much the litigation is funded, and disclosure of this information is not likely to result in relevant evidence or lead to information bearing on plaintiff’s claims for damages. Accordingly, this Court finds that plaintiff’s objection is proper as plaintiff’s litigation funding is not relevant to the defense of this case (see Quan v. Peghe Deli Inc., 2019 WL 3974786 [Sup Ct., Queens Cnty. 2019]; Cabrera v. 1279 Morris LLC, 2013 WL 5418611 [Sup Ct, Bronx Cnty. 2013]). Accordingly, and for the reasons stated above, it is hereby ORDERED, that defendants’ motion is denied; and it is further ORDERED, that plaintiff shall appear for the supplemental independent medical examination scheduled for August 13, 2020. Dated: August 11, 2020

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 18, 2024
New York, NY

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!


Learn More
April 25, 2024
Dubai

Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.


Learn More

Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...


Apply Now ›

Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...


Apply Now ›

Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›