OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Samuel Indig, Leah Indig, Meir Kahana, Robert Klein, and Naftali Klein bring this action against defendants The Village of Pomona (the “Village”), Brett Yagel, Louis Zummo, Leon Harris, and Doris Ulman, claiming defendants violated their rights under the United States Constitution; the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”); the New York State Constitution; and New York Civil Rights Law §40-c, by discriminating against plaintiffs on account of their religious affiliation. Specifically, plaintiffs claim defendants have used the Village codes to target Orthodox Jewish residents of the Village. Accordingly, plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief. Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 (Doc. #82). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1331. BACKGROUND For the purpose of ruling on the motion to dismiss, the Court accepts as true all well-pleaded factual allegations in the amended complaint, and draws all reasonable inferences in plaintiffs’ favor, as summarized below. I. The Plaintiffs The plaintiffs are religious Jews who reside in or own property in the Village. Each plaintiff claims to have suffered due to defendants’ actions to enforce the municipal codes. Plaintiffs allege defendants’ conduct is part of a broader campaign intentionally to discriminate against Orthodox Jewish residents of the Village. A. Samuel and Leah Indig Samuel and Leah Indig purchased a home in the Village in 2015. The Indigs applied for a building permit to undertake grading work in their backyard, which required the use of a tractor. The plan, prepared by the Indigs’ engineer, was approved. To get the tractor onto the Indigs’ property, “it was necessary to create a dirt path to enable the tractor to reach the bottom of the hill.” (Am. Compl. 72). Thereafter, defendant Building Inspector Louis Zummo issued a stop work order, asserting that the dirt path constituted a “road” which required a separate approval. (Am. Compl. 73). The Indigs appealed the stop work order to the Village zoning board. As the appeal was pending, the Indigs allege defendants intimidated and pressured the engineer and workers to cease work. They claim that, as a result of the stop work order, there is a “dangerously steep incline on their property,” which limits the use of their backyard and creates a risk of mud slides and a “breeding ground for mosquitos and ticks.” (Am. Compl. 76). According to the Indigs, defendants’ actions are part of “their agenda against Jewish residents” of the Village. (Am. Compl. 77). According to defendants, there is a pending proceeding in Ramapo Town Court against Leah Indig for failure to obtain a building permit and for violation of the stop work order. That proceeding remained pending as of time this motion was fully briefed. B. Meir Kahana Meir Kahana resides in the Village. The Village ticketed Kahana for a small pool purchased at Toys ‘R’ Us that was temporarily on his property. The Village also issued Kahana a warning for a dog waste violation, although Kahana maintains he does not own a dog. Kahana alleges defendant Deputy Mayor Leon Harris instructed Zummo to issue the violations, which Kahana attributes to intentional religious discrimination. (Am. Compl.
