X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The following papers numbered 1 to 3 Read on this motion, noticed on, and duly submitted as no. __on the Motion Calendar of__.PAPERS  NUMBEREDNotice of Motion — Order to Show Cause — Exhibits and Affidavits Annexed          1Answering Affidavit and Exhibits     2Replying Affidavit and Exhibits        3Notice of Cross-Motion — Affidavits and ExhibitsPleadings — ExhibitStipulation(s) — Referee’s Report — MinutesFiled PapersMemorandum of Law Defendant moves pursuant to New York City Civil Court Act §1805(b), transferring this action from the Small Claims Part to a Civil Court Part. Defendant seeks the foregoing relief on grounds that plaintiff possibly committed fraud such that discovery is required to properly defend this action. Plaintiff opposes the instant motion, averring that he did not commit any fraud and that he was not properly served with the instant motion.For the reasons that follow hereinafter, defendant’s motion is denied.The instant action is venued in the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court and is for property damage premised upon defendant’s negligence. The Small Claims Card — the equivalent of a complaint — alleges that defendant was negligent in the operation of his motor vehicle, such negligence causing damage to plaintiff’s vehicle. Thus, plaintiff seeks $5,000 in damages.Defendant’s motion is denied. Significantly, defendant offers no cognizable legal basis for the transfer of this action to Civil Court and his basis for the transfer — discovery necessary to defend himself — is obviated by the very exhibits he appends to his motion.New York City Civil Court Act §1805(b) states that[t]he court shall have power to transfer any small claim or claims to any other part of the court upon such terms as the rules may provide, and proceed to hear the same according to the usual practice and procedure applicable to other parts of the court.There is a dearth of case law interpreting and/or applying §1805(b). However, because New York City Civil Court Act §1804 obviates many of the rules governing actions brought in other courts, and “was [thus,] designed to facilitate the handling of minor claims and grievances without requiring the parties to resort to the use of counsel” (Buonomo v. Stalker, 40 AD2d 733, 732 [3d Dept 1972]), it is clear that before an action is removed from the Small Claims Part, depriving a litigant of the ability to quickly and easily resolve a legal dispute, the proponent must make a substantial showing (David D. Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, New York City Civil Court Act §1805 [Note: online version] ["Subdivision (b) permits a transfer of a small claim to the regular part of the court, but this may ordinarily be done only as the rules provide. It takes some strong reason to deprive a legitimate small claim of the use of the small claims part without some specific authority."]). Accordingly, a case ought to be transferred from Small Claims Court to Civil Court when the issues before the court are complex such that they require discovery, which is generally unavailable in Small Claims Court (New York City Civil Court Act §1804 ["Disclosure shall be unavailable in small claims procedure except upon order of the court on showing of proper circumstances."]; Pawling Lake Prop. Owners Ass’n v. McGoorty, 190 Misc 2d 701, 702-03 [App Term 2001] ["The court should have transferred the cases to a part of the court that is more suited to resolving such complex legal and factual issues. Substantial justice is not served by denying discovery and by attempting to truncate the trial of these issues."]; Fein v. Nuccio, N.Y.L.J., Dec. 14, 2000 [App Term 2000] ["In this small claims action to recover a legal fee for services rendered, the court below determined that the time that would be required to determine the issues being presented would take up too much of the time allotted for small claims determinations and that the case would be better suited for the regular part of the court. [internal quotation marks omitted]).In support of his motion, defendant submits a subpoena which he served upon Ultra Automotive Center Inc. (Ultra) and documents responsive thereto. The subpoena, dated March 7, 2019, requested documents from Ultra relating to the repair of plaintiff’s vehicle — a 2012 Toyota RAV 4. The documents which defendant represents were tendered by Ultra in response to the subpoena are five invoices for parts paid by Ultra and which total $1,799.67.Defendant also submits an email exchange between defendant’s counsel and Ultra, wherein Ultra states that it repaired plaintiff’s vehicle and charged him $5,000. Lastly, defendant submits an estimate from Ultra for the repairs needed by plaintiff’s vehicle. The estimated amount of repairs listed therein is $5,734.15. The invoice indicates that the foregoing sum was paid to Ultra by plaintiff on December 19, 2018.Based on the foregoing, defendant fails to establish entitlement to the transfer of this action from the Small Claims Part to a Civil Court Part. As note above, Small Claims Court “was designed to facilitate the handling of minor claims and grievances without requiring the parties to resort to the use of counsel” (Buonomo at 732). Thus, before an action is removed from the Small Claims Part, depriving a litigant of the ability to quickly and easily resolve a legal dispute, the proponent must make a substantial showing (David D. Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, New York City Civil Court Act §1805 [Note: online version]). Indeed, a case ought to be transferred from Small Claims Court to Civil Court only when the issues before the court are complex such that they require discovery (Pawling Lake Prop. Owners Ass’n at 702-03; Fein, N.Y.L.J., Dec. 14, 2000). Here, the allegations of fraud asserted by defendant are insufficient to warrant discovery as fraud is not tantamount to complexity. Indeed the terms are not synonymous. Moreover, if indeed defendant seeks to establish fraud by plaintiff — namely, that he seeks to recover from defendant sums significantly more than he alleges he paid to Ultra to repair his vehicle — the very documents annexed to defendant’s papers — if credited and sufficiently explained at trial — could establish the same. Accordingly, defendant’s motion is denied. It is herebyORDERED that all parties appear for a trial on July 9, 2019, in the Small Claims Part, Room 103, at 6PM. It is furtherORDERED that defendant serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry upon plaintiff within thirty days (30) hereof.This constitutes this Court’s decision and Order.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now

Legalweek(year) 2021

February 02, 2021 - July 14, 2021
Virtual

Legalweek(year) will bring together thousands of legal professionals for a series of 5 innovative virtual legal events.


Register

New York Legal Awards 2021

October 21, 2021
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Register

Dispute Resolution Forum 2021

June 16, 2021
Virtual

Legal professionals from In-House, Private Practice and the Bar work together to overcome challenges facing dispute resolution.


Register

Associate Position - Professional Liability Department

Philadelphia, New Jersey, United States

Philadelphia and Mt. Laurel, NJ Offices: Post & Schell, P.C. is looking for Associates for the Firm's expanding Professional Liabil...


Apply Now ›

Trusts And Estates Paralegal - Anderson Kill, New York Office

New York, New York, United States

This role requires providing paralegal support and assistance to attorneys in the management, coordination, and administration of all aspect...


Apply Now ›

Attorney - LItigation - INHOUSE

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

PERMANENT/FULL-TIME:    Come join a thriving company in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, DC!     The company's l...


Apply Now ›

MARTIN CLEARWATER & BELL, LLP

06/15/2021
NYLJ Web

MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL


View Announcement ›

GILL & CHAMAS

06/14/2021
NJLJ Web

GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.


View Announcement ›

MANDELBAUM SALSBURG PC

06/07/2021
NJLJ Web

Please to announce that....


View Announcement ›