Appellate Division, Second Department: October 18, 2018

By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Cohen and Miller, JJ.Abdus Shahid, ap, v. Nikolas Leonardos def, Dafnonas Estates, Ltd., res — Motion by the appellant pro se on an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 25, 2017, to waive compliance with the requirements regarding certification of the appellant’s appendix. Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a reply brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the decision is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v. J.A. Green Constr. Co., 100 AD2d 509); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion and the application are denied as academic.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

By Balkin, J.P.; Chambers, Cohen and Miller, JJ.Elizabeth Karen Rosenblatt, ap, v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, etc., et al., respondents def — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, two dated December 21, 2017, and one dated December 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the appeal from the order dated December 22, 2017, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice and leave to appeal has not been granted (see CPLR 5701); and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals from the orders dated December 21, 2017, is enlarged until November 21, 2018, and the record or appendix on those appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the motion is otherwise denied as academic.BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.