X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff Metra Industries, Inc., (“Plaintiff”) brings this Action against Defendant Rockland County, New York (the “County” or “Defendant”), alleging that Defendant has breached its contractual obligations in refusing to pay for work Plaintiff was contracted to perform. (See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1).) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as related to the release of the $300,816.22 in retainage alleged to be due to Plaintiff under the contract. (See Dkt. No. 24.) For the reasons to follow, the Motion is denied.:I. BackgroundA. Factual BackgroundIn resolving Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, the Court will recite only either undisputed facts or those set forth by Defendant and supported by the record. The Court will not, except as noted, set forth Plaintiff’s version of the facts where disputed.On September 3, 2013, the Parties entered into a contract (the “Contract”) pursuant to which Plaintiff was selected as the general contractor for the County’s Pascack Brook Bypass Culvert Project (the “Project”). (See Pl.’s Local Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts (“Pl.’s 56.1″) 2 (Dkt. No. 26); Def.’s Counterstatement to Pl.’s Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts (“Def.’s 56.1 Resp.”) 2 (Dkt. No. 28); Aff. of Kent Rigg (“Rigg Aff.”) 3 (Dkt. No. 28).) Pursuant to the Contract, Plaintiff was to “furnish and install approximately 1,572 lineal feet of 15′ x 7′ precast box culverts, 38 precast sewer manholes, 2,761 feet of PVC gravity sewer pipe…, two sanitary siphon chambers, all drainage structures[,]…and edge-to-edge road reconstruction.” (Pl.’s 56.1 4; Def.’s 56.1 Resp. 4.) The Contract specified that Plaintiff would be paid an amount not to exceed $8,900,000. (See Rigg Aff. 5.)The Contract incorporated by reference the Project Specifications and Addendums issued by the County, (see id. 6), which were incorporated as revised on May 23, 2013 (the “Revised Specifications”), (see id.). The Revised Specifications specifically allowed for the County to retain five percent from the monthly payments to Plaintiff until the completion and acceptance of all work covered by the Contract. (See id. 7; Pl.’s 56.1 7.) Under the Contract, the County would make its final payment, including the retainage amount, once Plaintiff furnished the following documents: (1) Agreement of Surety Company to Final Payment; (2) Contractors Affidavit of Payment; (3) Certificate of Substantial Completion; and (4) General Release. (See Rigg Aff. Ex. 1 (“Revised Specifications”) at 28.)As the work was done on the Project, Plaintiff submitted monthly payment applications to the County on the County’s “Standard Voucher Form,” in accordance with the terms of the Contract, less the five percent retainage. (Pl.’s 56.1

6-7; Def.’s 56.1 Resp.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 25, 2024
Dubai

Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.


Learn More
April 29, 2024 - May 01, 2024
Aurora, CO

The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.


Learn More

Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...


Apply Now ›

Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...


Apply Now ›

Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›